![]() ![]() These speakers have very poor off axis performance which is why i rarely use them. it can't play modern music like hip hop well and can sound a little too warm for most people. ![]() LS50 meta is nowhere near the level of graham ls6 when it comes to midrange. The sweet midrange and scale of graham ls6 is unmatched among the speakers I've had. p3esr xd in olive is the best looking speakers I've had. P3esr XD is in almost everyway inferior to falcon gold badge so whatever I've said above is true for p3esr xd as well. ![]() as computer speakers, the ls50 meta is more forgiving and a better match than falcon gold badge. Somehow though, the gold badge can be transparent to a fault and make certain recordings appear bright. Its mid-range magic is also better than the ls50 meta. hits harder and tighter than the ls50 meta. The bass on these are surprisingly better than the ls50 meta. Here are my quick opinions on how the meta compares to my other speakers low volume listening is also the best I've experienced. Off axis and imaging is absolutely wonderful as well. I don't know how is this possible since being detailed and warm is oxymoron. It in fact sounded just a tad warm yet highly detailed. It is really detailed yet it doesn't sound bright. The LS50 meta is as what the reviews said. I listen to my speakers on a desktop setting as my computer speakers. So I was very hesitant to get the meta but since the limited royal blue is available on the local market, and I have some spare cash, i went for it. Thought that they sounded hollow and a little too bright for my liking. much more expensive looking than the other speakers I have at the moment, though i would say the colour can be highly polarising.Ī little bit of context, I listened to LS50 (non meta) and have never liked them. It is a limited edition colour and I have to say, the finishing looks absolutely high-end. I saw a pair of used royal blue LS50 meta and immediately snatch it up at close to retail price. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |